Understand visible damage before intake.

This guide helps collectors describe card condition, understand repairability, and decide whether an intake review makes sense. It does not teach repair methods or guarantee outcomes.

Repairability key

Start with the outcome category.

Often improvableSometimes improvableUsually limitedNot recommendedReview required

Quick matrix

Scan repairability before submitting.

Damage typeRepairabilityRiskIntake
DentsSometimes improvableModerateYes
BendsOften improvableModerateYes
WhiteningUsually limitedReview requiredYes
Edge liftingSometimes improvableHighYes
Edge peelingUsually limitedHighYes
ScratchesUsually limitedReview requiredYes
WarpingOften improvableLowYes
Surface creasesSometimes improvableHighYes
Through creasesUsually limitedHighYes
Bubble creasesReview requiredHighYes
Moisture-related issuesReview requiredHighYes
Holo / surface hazeOften improvableLowYes
Print lines / texture defectsUsually limitedReview requiredYes

Dents

Sometimes improvable

Small pressure marks or indentations in the card surface.

A small pit, pressure point, or shine break that catches light at certain angles.

Risk
Moderate
Typical outcome
Some dents may become less visible, but deep dents can leave a visible scar.
Photos to submit
Front, back, close-up, and angled-light photos.
Intake recommended

Bends

Often improvable

Structural curves or bends in the card.

A card that bows, waves, or shows a bend line without always becoming a full crease.

Risk
Moderate
Typical outcome
Presentation may improve, but internal fiber damage or weakened layers can cause bend or warp return.
Photos to submit
Front, back, side/profile, and angled-light photos.
Intake recommended

Whitening

Usually limited

White areas along edges, corners, or damaged spots where ink or surface material is missing or disturbed.

White edge wear, corner wear, or pale marks where the printed surface no longer looks complete.

Risk
Review required
Typical outcome
Whitening usually cannot be repaired unless it is caused by lifting or peeling rather than missing material.
Photos to submit
Close-up edge and corner photos in bright neutral light.
Intake recommended

Edge lifting

Sometimes improvable

A raised or lifted edge where the card layer has begun to separate or curl upward.

A card edge that no longer lays flat or appears slightly separated from the layer below.

Risk
High
Typical outcome
Minor lifting may sometimes be reduced, but damaged fibers or weakened layers may not fully lay flat.
Photos to submit
Edge close-ups from above and from the side.
Intake recommended

Edge peeling

Usually limited

A more severe form of edge lifting where the surface layer is peeling, separating, or pulling away from the card.

Visible separation, flaking, or a loose edge that may worsen when handled.

Risk
High
Typical outcome
Edge peeling is higher risk and may not be fully repairable without unacceptable alteration.
Photos to submit
Edge, corner, and side-profile photos without touching or pulling the layer.
Intake recommended

Scratches

Usually limited

Surface lines, scuffs, or marks visible in direct light, especially on glossy or holo areas.

Fine lines, cloudy marks, or scratches that appear when the card is tilted.

Risk
Review required
Typical outcome
Very light visibility may improve in some cases, but deep scratches, missing ink, or damaged foil cannot be fully repaired.
Photos to submit
Angled-light photos from multiple directions.
Intake recommended

Warping

Often improvable

A card that does not sit flat due to moisture, storage, age, pressure, or internal tension.

Curling, bowing, or a card that rocks when placed on a flat surface.

Risk
Low
Typical outcome
Warping can often improve, but it may return if the card is not stabilized or stored properly.
Photos to submit
Flat-surface and side/profile photos.
Intake recommended

Surface creases

Sometimes improvable

A crease visible on one side of the card only. It may be broken or unbroken depending on whether the surface layer or fibers are visibly damaged.

A crease line, light-angle mark, or texture change on one face of the card.

Risk
High
Typical outcome
Even when improved, surface creases may still leave light-angle marks or texture changes.
Photos to submit
Front, back, close-up, and angled-light photos of the full crease path.
Intake recommended

Through creases

Usually limited

A crease visible on both the front and back of the card, often traveling deeper through the card structure.

A crease line that can be seen or felt from both sides.

Risk
High
Typical outcome
Through creases are harder to fully repair and usually remain visible even if presentation improves.
Photos to submit
Front and back close-ups, full-card photos, and angled-light photos.
Intake recommended

Bubble creases

Review required

A crease where part of the card layer has lifted, bubbled, or separated.

A raised or bubbled area around a crease, sometimes with layer separation.

Risk
High
Typical outcome
Bubble creases may reduce but can return if the internal layer or adhesive is damaged or weak.
Photos to submit
Angled close-ups from several sides, plus front and back photos.
Intake recommended

Moisture-related issues

Review required

Damage related to moisture sensitivity, swelling, water exposure, staining, or softened layers.

Clouding, waviness, swelling, staining, or texture that looks different from the rest of the card.

Risk
High
Typical outcome
Some presentation issues may improve, but severe water damage, swelling, and delamination may not be fully repairable.
Photos to submit
Full-card, close-up, side/profile, and angled-light photos.
Intake recommended

Holo / surface haze

Often improvable

A dull or cloudy surface caused by grime, haze, residue, or light buildup.

A holo or glossy area that looks muted, cloudy, or less clear than expected.

Risk
Low
Typical outcome
Visual clarity may improve when haze is buildup-related, but missing holo foil and permanent surface damage are not replaced.
Photos to submit
Angled-light photos that show the haze across the surface.
Intake recommended

Print lines / texture defects

Usually limited

Print defects, texture changes, or surface irregularities that may be original or damage-related.

Lines, raised texture, dull patches, or marks that become clearer under magnification or light.

Risk
Review required
Typical outcome
Many print and texture issues are documented for grade-risk review rather than treated.
Photos to submit
Close-up and angled-light photos, with the issue centered in frame.
Intake recommended

Guide boundaries

Repairability is reviewed card by card.

Age, card stock, finish, prior handling, severity, value, and grading goals can change the recommendation. Some cards should only be documented or left alone when more work would create more risk than benefit.

This guide is intentionally not a repair manual. It explains what to look for, what outcomes are realistic, and what photos help intake review.