Repairability key
Understand visible damage before intake.
This guide helps collectors describe card condition, understand repairability, and decide whether an intake review makes sense. It does not teach repair methods or guarantee outcomes.
Quick matrix
Scan repairability before submitting.
Dents
Sometimes improvableSmall pressure marks or indentations in the card surface.
A small pit, pressure point, or shine break that catches light at certain angles.
- Risk
- Moderate
- Typical outcome
- Some dents may become less visible, but deep dents can leave a visible scar.
- Photos to submit
- Front, back, close-up, and angled-light photos.
Bends
Often improvableStructural curves or bends in the card.
A card that bows, waves, or shows a bend line without always becoming a full crease.
- Risk
- Moderate
- Typical outcome
- Presentation may improve, but internal fiber damage or weakened layers can cause bend or warp return.
- Photos to submit
- Front, back, side/profile, and angled-light photos.
Whitening
Usually limitedWhite areas along edges, corners, or damaged spots where ink or surface material is missing or disturbed.
White edge wear, corner wear, or pale marks where the printed surface no longer looks complete.
- Risk
- Review required
- Typical outcome
- Whitening usually cannot be repaired unless it is caused by lifting or peeling rather than missing material.
- Photos to submit
- Close-up edge and corner photos in bright neutral light.
Edge lifting
Sometimes improvableA raised or lifted edge where the card layer has begun to separate or curl upward.
A card edge that no longer lays flat or appears slightly separated from the layer below.
- Risk
- High
- Typical outcome
- Minor lifting may sometimes be reduced, but damaged fibers or weakened layers may not fully lay flat.
- Photos to submit
- Edge close-ups from above and from the side.
Edge peeling
Usually limitedA more severe form of edge lifting where the surface layer is peeling, separating, or pulling away from the card.
Visible separation, flaking, or a loose edge that may worsen when handled.
- Risk
- High
- Typical outcome
- Edge peeling is higher risk and may not be fully repairable without unacceptable alteration.
- Photos to submit
- Edge, corner, and side-profile photos without touching or pulling the layer.
Scratches
Usually limitedSurface lines, scuffs, or marks visible in direct light, especially on glossy or holo areas.
Fine lines, cloudy marks, or scratches that appear when the card is tilted.
- Risk
- Review required
- Typical outcome
- Very light visibility may improve in some cases, but deep scratches, missing ink, or damaged foil cannot be fully repaired.
- Photos to submit
- Angled-light photos from multiple directions.
Warping
Often improvableA card that does not sit flat due to moisture, storage, age, pressure, or internal tension.
Curling, bowing, or a card that rocks when placed on a flat surface.
- Risk
- Low
- Typical outcome
- Warping can often improve, but it may return if the card is not stabilized or stored properly.
- Photos to submit
- Flat-surface and side/profile photos.
Surface creases
Sometimes improvableA crease visible on one side of the card only. It may be broken or unbroken depending on whether the surface layer or fibers are visibly damaged.
A crease line, light-angle mark, or texture change on one face of the card.
- Risk
- High
- Typical outcome
- Even when improved, surface creases may still leave light-angle marks or texture changes.
- Photos to submit
- Front, back, close-up, and angled-light photos of the full crease path.
Through creases
Usually limitedA crease visible on both the front and back of the card, often traveling deeper through the card structure.
A crease line that can be seen or felt from both sides.
- Risk
- High
- Typical outcome
- Through creases are harder to fully repair and usually remain visible even if presentation improves.
- Photos to submit
- Front and back close-ups, full-card photos, and angled-light photos.
Bubble creases
Review requiredA crease where part of the card layer has lifted, bubbled, or separated.
A raised or bubbled area around a crease, sometimes with layer separation.
- Risk
- High
- Typical outcome
- Bubble creases may reduce but can return if the internal layer or adhesive is damaged or weak.
- Photos to submit
- Angled close-ups from several sides, plus front and back photos.
Moisture-related issues
Review requiredDamage related to moisture sensitivity, swelling, water exposure, staining, or softened layers.
Clouding, waviness, swelling, staining, or texture that looks different from the rest of the card.
- Risk
- High
- Typical outcome
- Some presentation issues may improve, but severe water damage, swelling, and delamination may not be fully repairable.
- Photos to submit
- Full-card, close-up, side/profile, and angled-light photos.
Holo / surface haze
Often improvableA dull or cloudy surface caused by grime, haze, residue, or light buildup.
A holo or glossy area that looks muted, cloudy, or less clear than expected.
- Risk
- Low
- Typical outcome
- Visual clarity may improve when haze is buildup-related, but missing holo foil and permanent surface damage are not replaced.
- Photos to submit
- Angled-light photos that show the haze across the surface.
Print lines / texture defects
Usually limitedPrint defects, texture changes, or surface irregularities that may be original or damage-related.
Lines, raised texture, dull patches, or marks that become clearer under magnification or light.
- Risk
- Review required
- Typical outcome
- Many print and texture issues are documented for grade-risk review rather than treated.
- Photos to submit
- Close-up and angled-light photos, with the issue centered in frame.
Guide boundaries
Repairability is reviewed card by card.
Age, card stock, finish, prior handling, severity, value, and grading goals can change the recommendation. Some cards should only be documented or left alone when more work would create more risk than benefit.
This guide is intentionally not a repair manual. It explains what to look for, what outcomes are realistic, and what photos help intake review.
